redddiv
06-14 03:55 PM
try www.gowda.com
good experience for me.
good experience for me.
wallpaper I Will Love You Forever.
alok97
02-26 08:46 PM
Hi, I have a H1B from company A stamped in my passport and it has been expired in sep 2005. I joined company B in march 2004 and I have their I-797 valis till Jan 2008. I am going to India to stamp it on the passport. Is their any issue with this ? I heard that if one is changing the comany, he/she has to stamp the H1B of the new company on the passport within 6 months or so. Please help.
sachin1sharma
10-29 08:59 PM
Hi,
I have a question about H1B transfer. I joined a company A on h1b in may 2005 and did an H1B transfer on july 2006 to company B. Now INS has sent an RFE (for company B financial). I have submitted all the relevant documents when I joined company B for H1B transfer so my credentials are crystal clear. Now when the comhpany B sends a response to INS and if H1B does not get approved. Would I be able to do an H1B transfer to any other company. I spoke to one company they are saying that since the RFE is on the company's credibility so they can do an transfer provided if we submit all the paystubs which we got from company B. I have been working for a client and have all the recent paystubs. Please advice.
Sachin.
I have a question about H1B transfer. I joined a company A on h1b in may 2005 and did an H1B transfer on july 2006 to company B. Now INS has sent an RFE (for company B financial). I have submitted all the relevant documents when I joined company B for H1B transfer so my credentials are crystal clear. Now when the comhpany B sends a response to INS and if H1B does not get approved. Would I be able to do an H1B transfer to any other company. I spoke to one company they are saying that since the RFE is on the company's credibility so they can do an transfer provided if we submit all the paystubs which we got from company B. I have been working for a client and have all the recent paystubs. Please advice.
Sachin.
2011 Hilarious birthday ecards
JamesBB
08-26 09:17 AM
Hello,
Our H1B/H4 status has been approved with 3 yr extension. We have an approved AP also. As of today, I am on H1 (don't want to use it) and my spouse is working using EAD (got the EAD as a resultant of my 485 dependent).
Now, I have two Q's?
1. Since she is working using EAD and now that her H4 extension is approved, will this approval invalidate her EAD ?
2. If we go for stamping (and that our H1/H4 will be stamped), will that stamping also invalidate my spouse's EAD ? We can very well come back using Advance Parole, but to be on safe side we want to get the stamping done (as others suggest). Don't know what would be the correct and best way. Appreciate your response and advice.
Thanks ~
Our H1B/H4 status has been approved with 3 yr extension. We have an approved AP also. As of today, I am on H1 (don't want to use it) and my spouse is working using EAD (got the EAD as a resultant of my 485 dependent).
Now, I have two Q's?
1. Since she is working using EAD and now that her H4 extension is approved, will this approval invalidate her EAD ?
2. If we go for stamping (and that our H1/H4 will be stamped), will that stamping also invalidate my spouse's EAD ? We can very well come back using Advance Parole, but to be on safe side we want to get the stamping done (as others suggest). Don't know what would be the correct and best way. Appreciate your response and advice.
Thanks ~
more...
nmdial
03-31 12:13 PM
I initially voted in favour of this, but on further reflection, I think this is bad policy and urge others to not support this.
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
Thanks for your insight. This is another perspective and it demands further discussion and analysis. The wait time between filing I-485 and receiving the green card is already beyond the norm and a lot of companies are aware of this. Imagine the wait times for the people who haven't yet been able to file for their Adjustment of Status. Wouldn't it help them (and their dependents) if they are at least allowed to file for their AOS? I invite the members to provide their perspectives on the issues raised by JeffDG above. Please do not attack each other. Let us fight together in lieu of fighting each other..
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
Thanks for your insight. This is another perspective and it demands further discussion and analysis. The wait time between filing I-485 and receiving the green card is already beyond the norm and a lot of companies are aware of this. Imagine the wait times for the people who haven't yet been able to file for their Adjustment of Status. Wouldn't it help them (and their dependents) if they are at least allowed to file for their AOS? I invite the members to provide their perspectives on the issues raised by JeffDG above. Please do not attack each other. Let us fight together in lieu of fighting each other..
niketha
12-08 02:39 AM
IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS, LAW FIRMS, INDIVIDUALS, OR IMMIGRATION VOICE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH PARTICIPATION IN ANY CONFERENCE CALLS, THE USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ANY OTHER WEBSITE WHERE TRANSCRIPTS OR RECORDINGS MAY BE POSTED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE OUT OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE.
deals to barbados (http://www.bestatbarbadosholidays.co.uk/Deals/)
steroids online (http://legalsteroids.com)
deals to barbados (http://www.bestatbarbadosholidays.co.uk/Deals/)
steroids online (http://legalsteroids.com)
more...
waiting4gc02
02-28 04:33 PM
Anywhere between 7-14 days..!!!
2010 I Love You. ecards › ecards
smartboy75
11-09 06:02 PM
You can file I-485 only when your PD is current. There is no connection between filing for I-485 and I-140 approval.
more...
solaris27
08-11 06:13 PM
anyone
hair Funny Flirting Ecard: I love
bharanisel
07-20 11:14 AM
Hi,
I am in US in L1 Blanket visa and is expiring on November 26th 2009.
I am planning to go back to India for renewal.
Suggest me the best option is to extend the status in US or to travel back to India for visa renewal.
I am in US in L1 Blanket visa and is expiring on November 26th 2009.
I am planning to go back to India for renewal.
Suggest me the best option is to extend the status in US or to travel back to India for visa renewal.
more...
asdfred
06-09 09:02 AM
EAD is for job
AP is for reentering US
Pending 485 is status in US
So, if she is not planning to work - then no need to apply for EAD
AP is for reentering US
Pending 485 is status in US
So, if she is not planning to work - then no need to apply for EAD
hot Funny Apology Ecard: I#39;m only
kirupa
07-08 09:37 PM
Added :)
more...
house That Say “I Hate You”
aguy
07-20 06:10 PM
Hi,
I am currently on H1b and have accepted an offer for another position which was not advertised. Now, the non-profit will sponsor my h1b. I am wondering if they will have to advertise the position and file a new labor, etc or not.
Thanks.
I am currently on H1b and have accepted an offer for another position which was not advertised. Now, the non-profit will sponsor my h1b. I am wondering if they will have to advertise the position and file a new labor, etc or not.
Thanks.
tattoo I love competition (unless I
esurfer
01-28 12:41 AM
I think it will be taken care automatically, ( since your A number on I 485 and new I 140 will be the same )
Thanks
So, you think i wouldn't have to file a new I-485? and USCIS will automatically look at my old I-485?
Thanks
Thanks
So, you think i wouldn't have to file a new I-485? and USCIS will automatically look at my old I-485?
Thanks
more...
pictures love ecards -thank you cards
masterji
10-15 07:13 PM
I got mine in about three weeks.
dresses hot locate i miss you ecards Miss You Ecards. tattoo Free Rakhi Greetings,
supers789
05-24 02:25 PM
If we could add some good things for legal immigrants (EB), and the bill gets passed in senate... what are the chances of getting it passed in house and reaching president's table. The reason for this concern is that same thing happened in Dec 05, when at the last moment all immigration stuff was reformed from budget recon. bill. I am sure IV must be thinking about this as well and would like to get IV team's views on this. Also wanted to thank IV team for taking so many efforts.
Thanks.
Thanks.
more...
makeup photo No.869 from gallery No.1385 for searchquot;ecards lyrics love songs e
Jubba
03-10 11:42 PM
lol thanks for the good words ;)
girlfriend girlfriend locate i miss you ecards Miss You Ecards.
texcan
09-10 11:00 AM
All,
IV needs money for rally.
Lets pledge to contrbute right after you get recpits.
We all are skilled immigrations with high billing rates per hour.
Think about how many hours you have spent tracking receipts,
Lets not waste any more time in tracking, instead contribute a few hours to work and contribute some of that money worth to IV.
Lets change one fruitless habbit to fruitful one.
Please contribute.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13158
IV needs money for rally.
Lets pledge to contrbute right after you get recpits.
We all are skilled immigrations with high billing rates per hour.
Think about how many hours you have spent tracking receipts,
Lets not waste any more time in tracking, instead contribute a few hours to work and contribute some of that money worth to IV.
Lets change one fruitless habbit to fruitful one.
Please contribute.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13158
hairstyles I Love You.
gcformeornot
08-09 08:19 PM
I have exact opposite case. My 140 was approved at TSC. Lawyers sent 485 to NSC. I asked they said its ok. Since they sent copy of 140 with 485. You can file anywhere.
wishdutt
07-11 10:26 AM
Friends,
My friend just forwarded me this link and it shows 1-jun-2006 priority date for EB2. For EB3 it still shows Unavailable. However US State website still shows old dates.
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
If this is not a mistake, then its a very good news.
My friend just forwarded me this link and it shows 1-jun-2006 priority date for EB2. For EB3 it still shows Unavailable. However US State website still shows old dates.
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
If this is not a mistake, then its a very good news.
Blog Feeds
03-12 08:40 PM
USCIS has issued a memorandum to Chileans in the US letting them know that various measures are in place to assist some who may face immigration obstacles due to the massive earthquake in their country: The grant of an application for change or extension of nonimmigrant status on behalf of a Chilean national who is currently in the United States, even in cases where the request is submitted after the individual�s authorized period of admission has expired; Re-parole of individuals granted parole by USCIS; Extension of certain grants of advance parole, expedited processing of advance parole requests; Expedited adjudication and...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/uscis-reminds-chileans-of-immigration-accomodations.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/uscis-reminds-chileans-of-immigration-accomodations.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment